Corporate governance and hostile takeovers
نویسنده
چکیده
In the preceding paper Shivdasani (1993) estimates equations predicting the probability of a hostile takeover as a function of governance characteristics. He finds that additional outside directorships by board members decrease the probability of a takeover. Ownership by management and by affiliated blockholders also decreases the probability of a takeover, while ownership by unaffiliated blockholders increases this probability. These results suggest that corporate governance affects takeover probabilities through two channels: (1) suboptimal contracting within a firm can lead to poor corporate performance and hence affect the desirability of a takeover, and (2) governance structures can alter the cost of a takeover and hence affect the takeover process.
منابع مشابه
The Role of Hostile Takeovers in Corporate Governance
The study makes a distinction between the role of hostile takeovers as a mechanism for downsizing and exit in the process of ‘creative destruction’ and the role of hostile takeovers as a corporate governance mechanism for curbing managerial slack and opportunism. The likelihood that underperforming firms with ineffective internal governance structures are the targets of hostile takeover bids is...
متن کاملCorporate Governance and Merger Activity in the United States: Making Sense of the 1980s and 1990s
C orporate governance in the United States changed dramatically throughout the 1980s and 1990s. Before 1980, corporate governance—meaning the mechanisms by which corporations and their managers are governed—was relatively inactive. Then, the 1980s ushered in a large wave of merger, takeover and restructuring activity. This activity was distinguished by its use of leverage and hostility. The use...
متن کاملMobilizations for Antitakeover Legislation , 1982 – 1990
Elite mobilizations play a key role in shaping the contours of social institutions. Prior research has demonstrated that mobilizations and the resulting struggles between competing elites shape the social structure of markets (Fligstein 1996), corporate governance regimes (Davis and Thompson 1994), and organizations (Fligstein 1990; Zald and Berger 1978). More recent examples in the popular pre...
متن کاملEuropean takeover regulation
To foster corporate restructuring and capital market integration, the European Commission has repeatedly attempted to introduce Europe-wide takeover regulation, but has encountered strong resistance. We trace the sources of this resistance to differences in corporate governance arrangements across member states and outline the economic effects of takeover regulation, focusing in particular on p...
متن کاملGovernance of Corporate Takeovers: Time for Say-on-Takeovers?
Table A1. Glossary of Governance and Takeover Germs Term Description Hostile takeover Acquirer makes takeover offer without target firm board consent or approval Unsolicited takeover Generally synonymous with hostile takeover. Also means the offer was not requested by the target firm board. Antitakeover provisions Target firm provisions in the bylaws or board approved motions to prevent unsolic...
متن کامل